Brain Control Europe, USA

MINDCONTROL EUROPE !!!

Public awareness of the MIND CONTROL Technologies and experiments on humans and its impact on individuals and society in EUROPE, Sweden.

Only within a small sphere of military / medical classified research and industrial projects are factual knowledge available.

Even less is known and discussed issues concerning the electromagnetic system controlled by artificial intelligence in interaction with the human brain.

Brain-Computer Interaction and Artificial Intelligence technologies for research and / or implementation of which represent entirely new aspects of the problem in the issue of radiation protection, health, safety, privacy, confidentiality and informed consent.

Brain-Computer Interaction in electronic form, working alternately with the influence of a person or a group of people’s opinions, feelings, thoughts, reaction patterns, and memory and behavior.

Research and technological development is done in / moved to countries where legislation, control and public scrutiny is minimal or nonexistent.

Read this link:    www.capurro.de/ECLSC2010.ppt

Unofficial agreements and channels for sharing of research established between countries in the cartels.

In order to initiate a public debate, monitoring and impact analysis of the subject requires international cooperation over a number of topic levels.

Legislation applicable confidentiality and privacy is totally absent in this area.

This happens in Sweden now! A number of people living inStockholm,SWEDEN,EUROPE have  brains been “hijacked” the last three years.

A computer-assisted online connection has been made on objects brains.
Nano-implants have been injected without the consent of the subjects, when visiting the Hospital. After injection, the objects linked to the research computers.
Software for the development of synthetic telepathy has been going around the clock starting after hospital visits.

“My effort is to bring man back to his natural self. I will be
???,. Every religion, every tradition, every
morality, every ethical code is going to ??? me. That does not
surprise me! I expect it, because what I am saying and doing is changing
the very course of human consciousness.”

Look att this webblink:

Patent    http://remoteneuralmonitoring.com/home

Source: The Electronic Telegraph (England)
(From CNI News)

The End of Death: ‘Soul Catcher’ Computer Chip Due…
By Robert Uhlig

A computer chip implanted behind the eye that could record a person’s every lifetime thought and sensation is to be developed by British scientists.

“This is the end of death,” said Dr. Chris Winter, of British Telecom’s artificial life team. He predicted that within three decades it would be possible to relive other people’s lives by playing back their experiences on a computer. “By combining this information with a record of the person’s genes, we could recreate a person physically, emotionally and spiritually.”

Dr. Winter’s team of eight scientists at BT’s Martlesham Heath Laboratories near Ipswich calls the chip the ‘Soul Catcher.’ It would be possible to imbue a new-born baby with a lifetime’s experiences by giving him or her the Soul Catcher chip of a dead person, Dr. Winter said. The proposal to digitize existence is based on a solid calculation of how much data the brain copes with over a lifetime.

Ian Pearson , BT’s official futurologist, has measured the flow of impulses from the optical nerve and nerves in the skin, tongue, ear, and nose. Over an eighty year life, we process 10 terrabytes of data, equivalent to the storage capacity of 7,142,857,142,860,000 floppy disks.

Dr. Pearson said, “If current trends in the miniaturization of computer memory continues at the rate of the past 20 years – a factor of 100 every decade – today’s 8-megabyte memory chip norm will be able to store 10 terrabytes in 15 years.”

British Telecom would not divulge how much money it is investing in the project, but Dr. Winter said it was taking ‘Soul Catcher 2025′ very seriously. He admitted that there were profound ethical considerations, but emphasized that BT was embarking on this line of research to enable it to remain at the forefront of communications technology.

“An implanted chip would be like an aircraft’s black box and would enhance communications beyond current concepts,” he said. “For example, police would be able to use it to relive an attack, rape, or murder from the victim’s viewpoint to help catch the criminal.”

Other applications would be less useful but more frightening. “I could even play back the smells, sounds, and sights of my holiday to my friends,” Dr. Winter said.

Survival System

An anti-trauma network of implants, intended to maximise the chances of survival when the body is damaged. Small shunts can cut of blood loss and release protecting chemicals, as well as act as a pacemaker for the heart and lungs. If everything else is lost, the implant can douse the brain in neuroprotectants and lower body temperature to slow down damage so that an emergency cryonic suspension can be done.

Medical monitors

Likely the most common implants on Nova. Small sensors implanted in the body provides information on the health state which can be used to detect and diagnose illnesses at an early stage. Simple systems just give some chemical information, body data and a rough picture of activity in different organ systems. More advanced monitors are finely spread, detecting minute local changes and comparing the body’s reactions against medical models.

How long shall attempt to sacrifice their families and work have to fight for their human rights in the frenzy of abuse that is now underway on software developed for mapping the brain.

This development is a threat to democracy and much more.

DARPAS Humanoid POLICE. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLbla1IJ6oc&feature=share

Immortality only 20 years away says scientist

Scientist Ray Kurzweil claims humans could become immortal in as little as 20 years’ time through nanotechnology and an increased understanding of how the body works.’

Read more,,,  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6217676/Immortality-only-20-years-away-says-scientist.html

HAVE you ever thought about something you never shared with anyone, and have been horror-struck at the mere thought of someone coming to know about your little secret? If you have, then you probably have all the more reason to be paranoid now thanks to new and improved security systems being developed around the world to deal with terrorism that inadvertently end up impinging on one’s privacy.
Some of the countries involved in such programmes include USA, UK, Spain, Germany and France. Recently, the National Security Agency (NSA) of the US has developed a very efficient method of controlling the human brain. This technology is called Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and is expected to revolutionise crime detection and investigation.

What is it? RNM works remotely to control the brain in order to read and detect any criminal thought taking place inside the mind of a possible perpetrator. Research studies have shown that the human brain thinks at a rate of about 5000 bits per second and does not have the capacity to compete with supercomputers performing via satellites, implants and biotelemetry. The human brain has a distinctive set of bioelectric resonance system. For the RNM system, supercomputers are being used and, thus, with its help, supercomputers can send messages through an implanted person’s nervous system in order to influence their performance in a desired way.

RNM has been developed after about 50 years of neuro-electromagnetic involuntary human experimentations. According to many scientists, within a few years it is expected that DNA microchips will be implanted in the human brain which would make it inherently controllable. With RNM, it will be possible to read and control a person’s emotional thought processes along with the subconscious and dreams. At present, around the world, supercomputers are monitoring millions of people simultaneously with the speed of 20 billion bits per second especially in countries like USA, Japan, Israel and many European countries.
RNM has a set of certain programs functioning at different levels, like the signals intelligence system which uses electromagnetic frequencies (EMF), to stimulate the brain for RNM and the electronic brain link (EBL). The EMF Brain Stimulation system has been designed as radiation intelligence which means receiving information from inadvertently originated electromagnetic waves in the environment. However, it is not related to radioactivity or nuclear detonation. The recording machines in the signals intelligence system have electronic equipment that investigate electrical activity in humans from a distance. This computer-generated brain mapping can constantly monitor all electrical activities in the brain. The recording aid system decodes individual brain maps for security purposes.

What does it do?? For purposes of electronic evaluation, electrical activity in the speech centre of the brain can be translated in to the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the auditory cortex of the brain directly bypassing the ear. This encoding helps in detecting audio communication. It can also perform electrical mapping of the brain’s activity from the visual centre of the brain, which it does by bypassing the eyes and optic nerves, thus projecting images from the subject’s brain onto a video monitor. With this visual and audio memory, both can be visualised and analysed. This system can, remotely and non-invasively, detect information by digitally decoding the evoked potentials in 30-50Hz, 5 millwatt electromagnetic emissions from the brain. The nerves produce a shifting electrical pattern with a shifting magnetic flux which then puts on a constant amount of electromagnetic waves. There are spikes and patterns which are called evoked potentials in the electromagnetic emission from the brain. The interesting part about this is that the entire exercise is carried out without any physical contact with the subject.

The EMF emissions from the brain can be decoded into current thoughts, images and sounds in the subject’s brain. It sends complicated codes and electromagnetic pulse signals to activate evoked potentials inside the brain, thus generating sounds and visual images in the neural circuits. With its speech, auditory and visual communication systems, RNM allows for a complete audio-visual brain to brain link or a brain-to-computer link.

Of course, the mechanism needs to decode the resonance frequency of each specific site to modulate the insertion of information in that specific location of the brain. RNM can also detect hearing via electromagnetic microwaves, and it also features the transmission of specific commands into the subconscious, producing visual disturbances, visual hallucinations and injection of words and numbers in to the brain through electromagnetic radiation waves. Also, it manipulates emotions and thoughts and reads thoughts remotely, causes pain to any nerve of the body, allows for remote manipulation of behaviour, controls sleep patterns through which control over communication is made easy. This can be used for crime investigation and security management.

Concers ,,,With all the given benefits of RNM for tracking the illicit and treacherous activities, there are many concerns and risks being pointed out by human rights activists and other scientists. The agencies of human rights around the world have criticised RNM as a violation of basic human rights because it violates privacy and the dignity of thoughts and activities of life. Several countries have protested against it and refer to it as an attack on their human and civil rights. The scientists protesting against the use of RNM believe that people who have been implanted involuntarily become biological robots and guinea pigs for RNM activities in the guise of security. This is an important biological concern related to microchip implantation, which is a hidden technology using microwave radiations for the control of the mind.

Research & Progress of computer chips in the brain!

With computer chips in the brain: Who am I?

Of Susanna Radovic from F & F 2009. I remain the same person ony a part of my brain is replaced by a computer chip?

If it were possible, would you have to implant a computer chip in the brain that helped you to remember better? Or to concentrate long periods at a time, or smoothing any mood swings?

Today you can improve and modify the damaged cognitive and mental ability of medical means. But scientists are also on track to develop “brain prosthesis”, that is, artificial implants that can take over a damaged brain function. If Alzheimer’s disease has damaged the part of the brain that is responsible for storage of new memories, would simply be able to replace it with a prosthesis, a computer chip that works on the same principle as the brain itself and that can communicate with the brain’s nerve cells. Similar procedures could also replace other parts of the brain with artificial prostheses.

The development of new methods in medical research raises many ethical problems. Such is the case also with brain implants. But chip in the brain raises other philosophical questions, those related to the ego nature, personal identity, consciousness and free will.

When replacing a part of my brain with an implant will I become a different person? Or rather a robot? Will I be aware that I have a partial artificial brain, or I turn into a zombie? What happens to my free will – can I control my prosthesis or denture, which will govern me?

Research on brain prosthetics have been going on for decades. As early as 1964 placed Jose Delgado, neuroscientists at Yale University in U.S., Electrodes in the heads of both animals and humans with spectacular results. Before a stunned audience got Delgado, by simply pressing a button, a bull to stop an attack and calmly turn back. In his hand he had a remote that was connected to the electrodes inside the head of the bull, and a signal to the bull’s brain Delgado could get it to stop.

Could the same technology could be used to control people’s behavior? Is it possible to get a man to do anything against her own will by stimulating the brain in this way? Delgado performed similar experiments on humans, and when asked teach one subject in the laboratory Delgado as saying: “I suppose, Doctor, that your electricity is stronger than my will.”

False and true signal

To have free will can be described simply as the man himself has to decide over their own actions. In this case it seems rather like governing a subject’s or animal’s “and human” on the other hand, we think that’s not the fact that we can not help but pull on the lower leg on someone beats us on lap is a sharp restriction of our free will.

Torture, American Style — The Wave of the Future?

The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment defines torture as “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.”

This definition makes no distinction between mental torture and physical torture, nor is it restricted to acts inflicted on persons in prison or held under conditions of physical custody or control. Nevertheless, advocates and authorities consistently make such distinctions.

 Amnesty International has assumed a dominant role among non-governmental organizations, especially in its influence at the UN. Amnesty’s-oriented mandate, however, creates a blind spot, reducing or eliminating any possible focus on cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment inflicted on persons not physically confined or controlled.

The Initial Report of the United States of America to the UN Committee Against Torture, submitted four years late, reflects the “understandings”imposed by the US Senate in its ratification of the Convention. These provide a very convenient loophole for certain forms of torture and state terrorism. The Clinton Administration’s justification for these “understandings” is posted in Part II of the Report, from which I quote here.

“U.S. Understandings. In order to clarify the meaning of `torture’ and to delineate the scope of application of the Convention with the greater precision required under U.S. domestic law, the United States conditioned its ratification upon several understandings related to Article 1. …”

Assessment of mental pain and suffering can be a very subjective undertaking. There was some concern within the U.S. criminal justice community that in this respect the Convention’s definition regrettably fell short of the constitutionally required precision for defining criminal offenses. To provide the requisite clarity for purposes of domestic law, the United States therefore conditioned its ratification upon an understanding that, in order to constitute torture, an act must be specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering and that mental pain or suffering refers to prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from:

(1) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;

(2) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;

(3) the threat of imminent death; or

(4) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality.”

[JH Graf’s comment: This excludes from the definition of mental torture the deliberate exploitation of the victim’s anxieties or phobias. It also excludes such mental terrorism as the torture of animals and intense, frequent, malicious, organized interference with computers.]

“b. For similar reasons of clarity and specificity, United States adherence was conditioned on the understanding that the definition of `torture’ or physical control’ in order to clarify the relationship of the Convention to normal military and law enforcement operations.”

[JH Graf’s comment: This excludes all torture inflicted on persons not in custody, such as that involving terrorism and the use of electromagnetic or bio-altering weapons. See“John Akwei vs. NSA” and “Marks of Torture.”]

Torture by means of electromagnetic weapons, bio-altering weapons, and organized terrorism frequently occurs outside the bounds of physical custody. Its victims usually cannot identify the perpetrators, may not even understand the nature of their experiences, may consider themselves mentally ill or be regarded as such by others. Amnesty International is not interested in such victims because thay are not in prison cells.

Other non-governmental organizations likewise turn their backs. Advocates can “handle” such abuses as electric shock, mutilation, rape, and other physical attacks. These are graphic, documentable, attributable to particular individuals in particular places. State terrorism and mental torture, however, are inflicted from a distance, through surreptitious intrusion by nameless, faceless perpetrators using classified technologies and bio-altering weapons. These abuses are hard to document, hard to prove, easy to rationalize as symptoms of mental disorder. We victims are routinely ignored, disbelieved, dismissed. Thus, society at large makes itself an accomplice to the torture.

America’s torture agenda threatens everyone. There’s certainly no lack of torture in the world, and ordinary materials suffice to inflict suffering, but the forms of torture embraced by the United States of America are the wave of the future, since, of their very nature, they tend to discredit the victim. The world must come to terms with this awful reality, before it’s too late, for us victims and for the very continuance of civilization.

Whether a conspiracy of silence is a conspiracy of complicity, of cowardice, of stupidity, or of apathy is an academic consideration in the long run. Nothing but the truth will do. Nothing but justice under law will save the world.

Discuss this article in my Yuku Human Rights Community

The following paragraph has been posted on the world wide web as a Notice for legal purposes. I am being framed by the illegal use of Remote Neural Monitoring.

The person or persons performing the Remote Neural Monitoring are here by ordered to cease and desist said operations. All persons knowledgeable or participating in said illegal activity must report such to the proper authorities.

Think your thoughts are private?
Ever told a lie and been caught red-handed? Using brain-scanning by implants technology scientists are beginning to probe our minds and tell if we’re lying. Other scientists are decoding our desires and exploring the difference between our conscious and unconscious mind. But can you really trust the technology?

How threatening for mankind is an Artificial Brain ?   First let me state that at this moment the biggest threat for mankind is the human specie ! ABC-weapons in wrong hands can result in extreme damaging behavior. Read the link down under ! www.capurro.de/ECLSC2010.ppt By 2020, electronics will utilize molecule-sized circuits, the reverse-engineering of the human brain will have been completed, and bioMEMS will have evolved into bioNEMS (biological nanoelectromechanical systems). It will be routine to have billions of nanobots (nano-scale robots) coursing through the capillaries of our brains, communicating with each other (over a wireless local area network), as well as with our biological neurons and with the Internet. One application will be to provide full-immersion virtual reality that encompasses all of our senses. When we want to enter a virtual-reality environment, the nanobots will replace the signals from our real senses with the signals that our brain would receive if we were actually in the virtual environment. We will have a panoply of virtual environments to choose from, including earthly worlds that we are familiar with, as well as those with no earthly counterpart. We will be able to go to these virtual places and have any kind of interaction with other real (as well as simulated) people, ranging from business negotiations to sensual encounters. In virtual reality, we won’t be restricted to a single personality, since we will be able to change our appearance and become other people. Experience Beamers “Experience beamers” will beam their entire flow of sensory experiences as well as the neurological correlates of their emotional reactions out on the Web just as people today beam their bedroom images from their web cams. A popular pastime will be to plug in to someone else’s sensory-emotional beam and experience what it’s like to be someone else, à la the plot concept of the movie “Being John Malkovich.” There will also be a vast selection of archived experiences to choose from. The design of virtual environments and the creation of archived full-immersion experiences will become new art forms. The most important application of circa-2020 nanobots will be to literally expand our minds. We’re limited today to a mere hundred trillion interneuronal connections; we will be able to augment these by adding virtual connections via nanobot communication. This will provide us with the opportunity to vastly expand our pattern recognition abilities, memories, and overall thinking capacity as well as directly interface with powerful forms of nonbiological intelligence. It’s important to note that once nonbiological intelligence gets a foothold in our brains (a threshold we’ve already passed), it will grow exponentially, as is the accelerating nature of information-based technologies. A one-inch cube of nanotube circuitry (which is already working at smaller scales in laboratories) will be at least a million times more powerful than the human brain. By 2040, the nonbiological portion of our intelligence will be far more powerful than the biological portion. It will, however, still be part of the human-machine civilization, having been derived from human intelligence, i.e., created by humans (or machines created by humans) and based at least in part on the reverse-engineering of the human nervous system. Stephen Hawking recently commented in the German magazine Focus that computer intelligence will surpass that of humans within a few decades. He advocated that we “develop as quickly as possible technologies that make possible a direct connection between brain and computer, so that artificial brains contribute to human intelligence rather than opposing it.” Hawking can take comfort that the development program he is recommending is well under way. © 2003 Ray Kurzweil. Is it immoral to create an Artificial Brain ? I struggled a couple of years with this question especially in relation to the threatening part for mankind. This topic is covered separately ‘How threatening for mankind is an Artificial Brain ?’. Magnus Olsson (MINDTECH (sweden)

Simulated brain closer to thought                                           BBC News

By Jason Palmer Science and technology reporter, BBC News, Prague

This result completes the first phase of the brain simulation project

A detailed simulation of a small region of a brain built molecule by molecule has been constructed and has recreated experimental results from real brains.

The “Blue Brain” has been put in a virtual body, and observing it gives the first indications of the molecular and neural basis of thought and memory.

Scaling the simulation to the human brain is only a matter of money, says the project’s head.

The work was presented at the European Future Technologies meeting in Prague.

The Blue Brain project launched in 2005 as the most ambitious brain simulation effort ever undertaken.

While many computer simulations have attempted to code in “brain-like” computation or to mimic parts of the nervous systems and brains of a variety of animals, the Blue Brain project was conceived to reverse-engineer mammal brains from real laboratory data and to build up a computer model down to the level of the molecules that make them up.

The first phase of the project is now complete; researchers have modeled the neocortical column – a unit of the mammalian brain known as the neocortex which is responsible for higher brain functions and thought.

“The thing about the neocortical column is that you can think of it as an isolated processor. It is very much the same from mouse to man – it gets a bit larger a bit wider in humans, but the circuit diagram is very similar,” Henry Markram, leader of the Blue Brain project and founder of the Brain Mind Institute in Switzerland, told BBC News.

He added that, when evolution discovered this “mammalian secret”, it duplicated it many many times and then “used it as it needed more and more functionality”.

Virtually there

It’s a matter of if society wants this. If they want it in 10 years, they’ll have it in 10 years.

Henry Markram
Brain Mind Institute

Professor Markram told the Science Beyond Fiction conference that the column is being integrated into a virtual reality agent – a simulated animal in a simulated environment, so that the researchers will be able to observe the detailed activities in the column as the animal moves around the space.

“It starts to learn things and starts to remember things. We can actually see when it retrieves a memory, and where they retrieved it from because we can trace back every activity of every molecule, every cell, every connection and see how the memory was formed.”

The next phase of the project will make use of a more advanced version of the IBM Blue Gene supercomputer that was used in the research to date.

“The next phase is beginning with a ‘molecularisation’ process: we add in all the molecules and biochemical pathways to move toward gene expression and gene networks. We couldn’t do that on our first supercomputer.”

Organised columns of neurons have been simulated molecule by molecule

Moreover, Professor Markram thinks the exponential rise in computing power will allow the project in 10 to 20 years to integrate many facets of medicine, right down to genomic profile, eventually creating a vast database for “personalised medicine”. Such an approach would allow researchers to simulate, on the level of an individual, how they will respond to a given drug or treatment. Emerging arts The conference is a meeting to foster high-risk, multidisciplinary research in information and communication technologies (ICT), and as such is a mix of many types of researchers, from computer scientists to biologists. Not all of them agree that the lofty ultimate goals of the Blue Brain project are achievable. Wolfgang Wahlster of the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, and a chief German government scientific adviser on ICT, thinks that the reductionist strategy of the project is flawed – that it won’t see the forest for the trees. “Imagine you could follow in one of the most advanced Pentium chips today what each and every transistor is doing right now,” he told BBC News. “Then I ask, ‘What is happening? Is Word running? Are you doing a Google search?’ You couldn’t answer. Looking at this level you cannot figure it out. “This is very interesting research and I’m not criticising it, but it doesn’t help us in computer science in having the intelligent behaviour of humans replicated.” Professor Markram believes that by building up from one neocortical column to the entire neocortex, the ethereal “emergent properties” that characterise human thought will, step by step, make themselves apparent. “They are not things that are easily predicted by just knowing elements – by definition – but by putting them together you can explore the principles, where they came from. Basically that’s what we’re after: understanding the principles of emergent properties.” Such emergent properties lead to the very essence of being human – the spatial awareness of lower mammals graduates to political views and artistic expression in humans. When asked when the simulation would come up with something artistic or an invention, Professor Markram said it was simply a matter of money. “It’s not a question of years, it’s one of dollars. The psychology is there today and the technology is there today. It’s a matter of if society wants this. If they want it in 10 years, they’ll have it in 10 years. If they want it in 1000 years, we can wait.”

The age of pharmaceutical microchipping is now upon us. Novartis AG, one of the largest drug companies in the world, has announced a plan to begin embedding microchips in medications to create “smart pill” technology.

Brain Implants for MIND CONTROL // Minduploading

Brain Implants for MIND CONTROL!

There could be conflict between the personal freedom to use one‘s economic resources to get an implant that will enhance one‘s physical capabilities and what society at large considers desirable or ethically acceptable.“

How threatening for mankind is an Artificial Brain ?

First let me state that at this moment the biggest threat for mankind is the human specie ! ABC-weapons in wrong hands can result in extreme damaging behavior.

Brainchip video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p06RLa6Wuys

25-04-2010. MINDTECH seeks to establish a network of laymen and media. This group will be dealing with the social and ethical sides to research, development and the implementation of emerging technologies in our society.

Meanwhile, philosophers working alongside the researchers say it’s time to find out more about how the public feels about such bionic research, which in some cases is being used to enhance human memory, physical abilities and perception.“

MindUploading.org addresses the specific issues that may arise when neural prostheses are customized to a specific patient, and when large scale neural prostheses lead to whole brain emulation: the emulation of a patient’s complete brain function in a prosthetic substrate. Site content is focused on neuroscience and computational research that is involved in an eventual progression from neural prostheses to the applied science of whole brain emulation, including the concept of “mind-transfer”.

Implant chip in the human brain.Synthetic telepathy is communication systems built on thoughts, not speech. Multimedia communication network is based. Brain copying is performed around the clock, largely by learning computer, copying is nothing short of serious torture. No one would voluntarily give informed consent to this serious research abuse. It takes years of learning and program development to develop the new computer-brain interfaces and multimedia language between man and computer. Subjects are now against their will has been online for five years on Man-Brain-Computer-Interface.

Read  E.U -commisioner Professor Rafael Capuros presentation.

www.capurro.de/ECLSC2010.ppt

The age of pharmaceutical microchipping is now upon us. Novartis AG, one of the largest drug companies in the world, has announced a plan to begin embedding microchips in medications to create “smart pill” technology.

The microchip technology is being licensed from Proteus Biomedical of Redwood City, California. Once activated by stomach acid, the embedded microchip begins sensing its environment and broadcasting data to a receiver warn by the patient. This receiver is also a transmitter that can send the data over the internet to a doctor.

The idea behind all this is to create “smart pills” that can sense what’s happening in the body and deliver that information to the patient’s doctor. Novartis plans to start microchipping its organ transplant anti-rejection drugs and then potentially expand microchipping to otherpharmaceuticals in its product lineup. This same technology could soon end up in pills made by other drug companies, too.

The best laid plans…

News:

News: See us at the first public workshop on Advancing Substrate Independent Minds (ASIM-2010), August 16-17, organized by carboncopies.org, satellite to the Singularity Summit inSan Francisco.

The Oxford Whole Brain Emulation workshop
(the resulting Roadmap)

Whole Brain Emulation at the Singularity Summit 2009
(slides to Dr. Randal A. Koene’s talk, also see Anders Sandberg, David Chalmers and Robin Hanson)

Whole Brain Emulation at AGI-10

Whole Brain Emulation at the Terasem workshop

What you can do:

• Educate yourself further by visiting our information-packed Mind Control Information Center.
• Learn more about the intriguing history and development of controversial mind control programs in  this excellent two-page summary. Footnotes and links to reliable sources are provided for verification purposes.
• For reliable, verifiable information from major media articles on the little-known, yet critical topic of nonlethal weapons, click here and here.
• Read powerful, reliable major media articles on electronic harassment and government mind control programs at this link.
• Inform your media and political representatives of this critical information. Contact those close to you at this link. Urge them to bring this information to light and encourage public dialog on this important civil rights issue.
• Spread this news to your friends and colleagues, and bookmark this article on key news websites using the “Share This” icon on this page, so that we can fill the role at which the major media is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference.

37 Replies

1. Ander. MMay 5th 2010

Meanwhile, philosophers working alongside the researchers say it’s time to find out more about how the public feels about such bionic research, which in some cases is being used to enhance human memory, physical abilities and perception.

1. Liss.usaMay 5th 2010

“There’s a recognition that this technology does shape the world in which people live.”

1. Martin UKMay 5th 2010

Tending to civilize human experimentation (HE) intentionally disregards law and ethics. Are existing laws providing sufficient defense against experiments done without consent? What chance does a person stand in the court of law when making a case against the government, industry and military for illegal experimentation? And to make the matter worse, how does a victim take legal action when statements or proofs are non-admissible as testimony in a court of law.

1. Ingrid LarssenMay 7th 2010

Ingrid Larssen 4 January, 2010
I have a very interesting story to tell regarding science/technology and a night visit/science experiment performed (without consent) why – its a long story. Said individual came to Agencies attention when contacted Anti-Terrorist Hotline and descovered her wistleblowing was of great interest to them. They descended (Agencies) for 18 mths and said individuals life was turned upside down. Why – contact me & I’ll tell you. Feeling used, abused and trampled on. The covert operation left said individual alone at sea and uninformed. I have a lot to get off me chest – contact me a give me a chance to tell my story, only you will need a very open mind.

1. Prof. M SWEDENMay 7th 2010

At first sight ICT implants are ethically unproblematic if we think for instance about cardiac pacemakers. However, although particular ICT implants may be used to repair deficient bodily capabilities, others are ethically more problematic, particularly if such devices are accessible via digital networks. ICT implants, due to their network capability could be misused in several ways for all kinds of social surveillance or manipulation.

The idea of placing ICT devices “under our skin” in order not just to repair but even to enhance human capabilities gives rise to science fiction visions with threat and/or benefit characteristics. However, in some cases, the implantation of microchips with the potential for individual and social forms of control is already taking place.

1. Gina RydlandMay 29th 2010

Martin,

Thank you for quoting from my article “Human experimentation for the sake of technological progress?!”

For those who are interested please read the rest of the article here:
http://www.mindcontrol.se/?page_id=1243

Best Regards, Gina Rydland, Freelance journalist
————————

Martin UK

May 5th 2010

Tending to civilize human experimentation (HE) intentionally disregards law and ethics. Are existing laws providing sufficient defense against experiments done without consent? What chance does a person stand in the court of law when making a case against the government, industry and military for illegal experimentation? And to make the matter worse, how does a victim take legal action when statements or proofs are non-admissible as testimony in a court of law.

1. Gina RydlandMay 30th 2010

The link to “Human experimentation for the sake of technological progress?!”

http://www.irpt.info/progress.html

1. Brett USAJun 5th 2010

I stumbled onto your site, and think you did an fantastic job. I am very motivated as a Ti and human rights activist. There is power in numbers and making contact and coordinating with others in our situation is important. I have a Web sitehttp://www.unwittingvictim.com In my case I am very grounded, with a stable foundation, although the perpetrators are short circuiting my short term memory and stopping my free ability to think. I am in communication with other well grounded group leaders in the US on a daily basis. We could possibly combine our efforts on a project that we find mutually beneficial and motivating. We need to ensure we follow through with any of our efforts, while combining our individual efforts to form a stronger and more powerful whole. We are all adversely affected, mind bending is the only word that I can think of that conveys what our, the Ti community’s, knowledge base suffers through. We need join forces to ensure we are a force to be reckoned with on a project of our choosing. We would be a group of Ti’s who have awareness foundation, understand the gravity of the harm and hardship, are well grounded, and are motivated.
Are you aware of Intel’s brain chip within 10 years for the consumer. http://www.unwittingvictim.com/Intel.html

Standing together for human rights,
Brett

1. Martin u.sJun 7th 2010

With this increase in connectivity of brain to chip and chip to brain comes increased assimilation and learning time. After implantation (still an outpatient procedure) it will take 30 to 90 days of neuron growth around the chip for it and the brain to become fully integrated. Upon chip integration, the newly chipped person will need to attend nine months of intensive classroom based courses, where they are taught new ways to think, process thoughts, and to categorize memories and data.

1. Brett USAJun 20th 2010

Miracle technology could allow people to transmit their brainwaves and speak to each other mind-to-mind. Scientists are working to create computers that read thoughts to find terrorists, and machines to scan our minds like thumbprints–causing some to wonder if “thought theft” could become the crime of the future.

1. adminJun 28th 2010

So what exactly am I talking about here? Simply put, it is the ability to use a small computer to feed information directly to the brain. This is now the stuff of science fiction, but according to the people doing the research, not all that difficult do accomplish. The end result is seen as a nano-computer, implanted under the skin somewhere on the body. This computer would be wirelessly updated and able to wirelessly transmit information to nano-implants in the brain. Eventually you could have all the information in the world available to your brain. Everyone could in theory, know everything.

1. adminJun 28th 2010

Hej Magnu Olsson SWEDEN;

Det otroliga, det snabbserverande uttrycken “Synd, men omöjligt— av högre
komplexitet—Man råkar på dessa reaktioner var man än befinner sig på energiskalorna;

Jag bör om någon kunna känna dragen hos de reaktioner i människan som spontant a l l t i d förnekar
existensen av det psykiatrin gett namn, symtom (vilken bredd!) o s v

Men här hara vi ett slag av problem som är f ö r mediaintressant för att bara vinkas bort.
Sålunda: 1. Media kan göra goda affärer på att med full kraft ta spets på avslöjanden om hur
Hjärnornas krig pågår bakom Lyckta dörrar som en tredimensionell Kafka och Moment 22.

En normalanpassad individ har icke en chans i detta myller av dementier, nyheter utan adress, hätska hatkrig i professurernas
normaltillstånd om stora nya framsteg uppdagas;

Och att vinna Hjärnornas krig är en utopisk tanke, forskarna får ofta bakläxa på de bataljer
man genomstridit utan att ha fokus på resultat.

En reaktion som är enutmaning till alla dessa ^NANO- och övriga disciplinner där articifiell människa
skapas;

O m det skulle vara mpöjligt att inplantera mottagare och sändare samt efterhärma våra hjärnors innersta koder –
ja, skulle det då inte vara fullt rimligt – ja, snarast ett ANSVAR från samhällets sida! – att a) lindra de plågor de utsatta
mänskliga “experimentmössen” dagligen, ja stundligen dygnet runt i ett evighetshjul, b) Skulle dessa i och för sig
starka individer – som orkar stå ut, hur nu än plågan har för grogrund – inte kunna bringas till ett drägligt medverkande i reell
forskning oc där målet är attt stoppa “störningarna” samt jaga bort det som utan försökspersonens godkännande pågår.

Visst.
Men politik är vanskligt.
Jag föreslår att krafter som kan vinna gehör i det svenska valet denna sensommar—-att man letar fram kanaler så att Hjärnornas krig kommer i
rampljuset i Sverige.
Där finner vi “allt”; Ny tekniks spitzenkraft-Centrum.. S Thorwald Olsson
blogg http://thorwaldscomeback.blogspot.com FIGUR: THORWALD oLSSONS BOKMÄRKE – SKAPAT 2010. hJÄRNORNAS KRIG, DEL 1.

1. TomasJun 29th 2010

Indeed, most of the technology involved is exactly identical to that of cell-phone technology. Satellites link the sender and the receiver. A computer “multiplexer” routes the voice signal of the sender through microwave towers to a very specifically defined location or cell. The “receiver” is located and tracked with pinpoint accuracy, to within a few feet of actual location. But the receiver is not a cell phone. It’s a human brain.

1. EvaJun 30th 2010

Frågan om vari personlig identitet egentligen består har länge diskuterats av filosofer. Personlig identitet är enligt de flesta inte avhängig av den fysiska kroppen. Många skulle nog hålla med om att jag är samma person som jag var för 20 år sedan, trots att jag inte ser likadan ut och att så gott som alla celler i min kropp är utbytta. Det är nog heller ingen som skulle vilja hävda att man inte längre är samma person för att man har en benprotes i stället för sitt medfödda ben eller för att man har förändrat sitt utseende med plastikoperationer. Men var går gränsen? Kan man byta ut sin hjärna mot en protes?

1. Ulf swedenJun 30th 2010

Jag tror att röster, tanketerror, filmer i huvet, migrän, epilepsi och muskelryckningar och konstiga hjärtklappningar alla kommer med tankeöverföring. Med enkelt språk det är tankestrålning som överför detta. Så om man startar ett elektromagnetiskt fält med t.ex en kopparprocessor (finns i gamecube) med ett program eller en sorts modul som gör ett bra fält då kan man ta bort alla dessa symptom och få rikare klarare tankeförmåga och mer vivid bättre minne och mer gjädje och lyxigare egna känslor. Men ibörjan kan man inte prata så bra men ens tanke är lätt att förstå.

Jag tror också man kan blockera det som sänds ut från huvet (nanoradiovågor) och då stängs mindcontrol av och man får aldrig hicka eller huvudvärk.
Peter

1. Magnus Contact:Jul 2nd 2010

The future may well involve the reality of science fiction’s cyborg, persons who have developed some intimate and occasionally necessary relationship with a machine. It is likely that implantable computer chips acting as sensors, or actuators, may soon assist not only failing memory, but even bestow fluency in a new language, or enable “recognition” of previously unmet individuals. The progress already made in therapeutic devices, in prosthetics, and Brain in computer science indicate that it may well be feasible to develop direct interfaces between the brain and computers

1. Robin USAJul 5th 2010

Problem: How do hippocampal neurons work?

Solution: Ted Berger, with joint appointments in biomedical engineering and biological science, bombards live rat hippocampal neurons with electrical impulses and records the emerging electrical signals.

Next Problem: How do you model non-linear systems?

Solution: USC biomedical/electrical engineer Vasilis Marmarelis writes mathematical equations to represent the complex input and output activity of the neurons observed by Berger.

Next Problem: How do you turn those models into chips?

Solution: USC computer scientist John Granacki builds silicon chips that recreate the input and output activity modeled by Marmarelis.

Next Problem: How do you reproduce the brain’s massively parallel structure to create a small but workable implant?

Solution: USC electrical engineer Armand Tanguay replaces the wires on Granacki’s computer chips with laser optics to allow the connection of more than 10,000 neural models on a single network no larger than a peanut.

Next Problem: How do you get living neurons to interface with the implanted chip?

Solution: USC molecular pharmacologist Roberta Brinton discovers that neurons adhere better to gold than to other substances. She builds an insulated version of Tanguay’s chip with gold connecting electrodes.

Next Problem: How do you get the connections between the brain and the implant to last?

Solution: USC chemist Mark Thompson is using nanoscale DNA ladders, chemically cut from single strands of DNA, to hold the neurons’ dendrites and axons to the electrodes on Brinton’s insulated chip.

1. Magnus Contact:Jul 5th 2010

The role of the hippocampus in associative memory is the establishment of long-term, declarative memories. For example, memories for facts, names, and life experiences. Damage to the hippocampus leads to loss of ability to convert short-term memory to new long-term memories.

Clinical applications of a biomimetic implant which replaces damaged brain function might be Stroke [preferential damage to CA1 neurons], Brain Trauma [preferential damage to hippocampal hilar neurons], Epilepsy [preferential damage to CA3 pyramidal cells], and Alzheimer�s Disease [preferential damage throughout the hippocampus].

Replacing a Component of the Hippocampal Neural Circuit with a Biomimetic VLSI Device
A candidate device is a TMSC 0.18 micron CMOS (MOSIS) microchip.

Its circuitry includes A/D and D/A controllers, signal processing of input waveforms for population spike waveform identification and amplitude measurement.

Its footprint allows expansion to 100 CA3 models if required, i.e., replacement of 100 hippocampal circuits.
Cortical Neural Prosthetics at USC’s Biomimetic MicroElectronic Systems

“Link the brain to the external world by computer processing the recorded neural signal to extract the subject�s command to control an external device.” — Andrew B. Schwartz 2004

The newly developed systems at BMES will allow bi-directional communication with tissue and by doing so enable implantable/portable microelectronic devices to treat presently incurable human diseases such as blindness, paralysis, and memory loss.

These systems use cortical signals as inputs to a brain–machine interface. The elements of these systems are (1) Recording Units (microelectrode arrays) comprised of microwires, silicon micromachined microprobes, and tissue reactions, (2) Decoding Units (extraction algorithms), and (3) Actuators (prosthetic effectors) comprised of computers, robotic arms or stimulators.

Go to the USC BMES Site »

1. AnderAug 4th 2010

“Could a media system, controlled by a few global corporations with the ability to overwhelm all competing voices, be able to turn lies into truth?…”

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13062.htm
Omega – 29. Jul, 22:42

1. MattiasAug 29th 2010

It is’t nanotechnology and it is not new, though the principle of involuntary ‘mind-control’ through implantable devices is the same. Chapin’s team strapped tiny video cameras to the human to see whether they might be used to transmit images and sounds of people. But Chapin says the camera needs to be refined to compensate the humans’ jerky movements and the power backpack has to be miniaturized (nano), for implanting the brain.

1. MattiasSep 7th 2010

Sending electrical shocks into the brain via a “brain pacemaker” has already led to dramatic breakthroughs like the revival of a man trapped in a vegetative state for six years, but new research may mean that the technique is soon a common treatment for disorders like depression and OCD. Researchers from the Cleveland Clinic, Mass General, Harvard Medical School and Brown Medical School implanted the Medtronics brain pacemaker into 17 people suffering from depression and tracked them for a year, finding significant improvements in mood as well as social and occupational functioning, while 26 patients suffering from OCD were followed for three years and also showed “marked improvement.” Findings will be presented to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons this week in Chicago, and clinical trials are scheduled for later this year — in other news, sales of “The Terminal Man” to neurosurgeons recently skyrocketed for unknown reasons.

1. MattiasSep 19th 2010

The mass media have not reported that an implanted person’s privacy van- ishes for the rest of his or her life. S/he can be manipulated in many ways. Using different frequencies, the secret controller of this equip- ment can even change a person’s emotional life. S/he can be made aggress- ive or lethargic. Sexuality can be artificially influenced. Thought sig-nals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or consent of the implanted person.

Läs mer: http://forums.myspace.com/t/3828562.aspx?fuseaction=forums.viewthread#ixzz100wHuv42

1. Mike U.S.ASep 20th 2010

„There could be conflict between the personal freedom to use one‘s economic resources to get an implant that will enhance one‘s physical capabilities and what society at large considers desirable or ethically acceptable.“

1. Magnus Contact:Sep 22nd 2010

“Part of my concern is that when we start seeing these things emerging, we’re going to suddenly find that the people who could bring benefits to us won’t because they’re scared of the legal uncertainty,” he said. “So one of the things we’re trying to promote is a debate about the rights and wrongs – the ethics – and that should inform the law afterwards.”

1. U.S.A MartinSep 25th 2010

Society, or the more technical strata, will grow used to the idea of augmentation and that will produce great benefits. Then a few daring souls will allow the conversion from biological brain cells to hardware brain cells to proceed further. Greater and greater proportions of the brain will convert. Someone will allow total conversion and prove ( as far as it can be proven ) that they are the same person. Perhaps someone terminally ill will volunteer. It certainly is a possible road to immortality.

1. Magnus Contact:Sep 27th 2010

Hjärnchipet kopplas till nätverksteknik uppstår det nya kommunikationsspråket syntetisk telepati.
Med ett datachip i hippocampus kan man med lärande datorer och nätverkstekniken låta datorer utföra språkavkodning och sedan rekonstruera hjärnans språk i en datorhjärna. Detta är grunden för artificiell och kollektivt medvetande.

1. Andrew UKOct 10th 2010

The Pentagon and the U.S. intelligence agencies known as the N.S.A. [
National Security Agency ], C.S.S. [ Central Security Service ], D.I.A. [
Defense Intelligence Agency ], and the C.I.A. [ Central Intelligence
Agency ], have extremely top secret technology which can up the private
thoughts given by individuals from the infrasound vibrations produced by the brains’ electrochemical impulses, i.e. brainwaves. These brainwaves can be broadcast via microwave tranceivers, infrasound and ultrasound tranceivers,
TDRS [ Tracking and Data Relay Satellites ], GPS [ Global Positioning
Satellites ], and any other form of technology which uses electromagnetism,

1. Andrew UKOct 10th 2010

In one of the other posts, we talked about how the internet will drive a brain interface. That and medical needs will drive the research. Right now very experienced researchers are working on ways to do this but few of them have the money they need to do the work. All the money is going into new tennis rackets ( an example that is a bit dated now ). or other ways to make quick money. Business looks to the next quarter, the next year. To do this research you have to look five and ten years down the road. And nobody invests in that blue sky research.
I’m probably a year or more out of date on what is actually being done. I hope there is a lot of fundamental research that we can use, but if they patent it, that just locks it up. I hope the nanofactory animation I did contributed something to the mix that can’t be owned by some corporation. Probably not, it was too theoretical and not based on real research.

We will definitely have protesters. This is the most radical technology the human race has ever invented. NOTHING comes close. Everything will be labeled as evil by someone. Let’s just hope enough people want the results. The stem cell controversy is the exact type of problem we will see. Moral arguments will affect how the laws are written. If the government is conservative, it will be inhibited and controlled, if the government is more liberal, it will be supported. Everybody votes their values.
John

1. WaheedOct 28th 2010

I was trying to update your website several times but couldn’t.
This website could be trap by the NATO soldiers to see how their victim reacts on their HAARP activities.
I have witnessed most of their functions and they used it against me.

I need someone to guide me how to stop them.
I suffer high blood pressure because of the dreams they show it to me. i suffer high cholesterol and triglyceride. if anybody suffering from the same symptoms please let me know.
Regards
Waheed

1. Anders UKNov 2nd 2010

Webbplats:http://minduploadingproject.org/Företagsfakta:
MIND UPLOADING is the hypothetical technology of transferring a biological brain into a computer system. Sufficient computer power for human brain simulation is expected between 2013-2025.
– It means mind uploading could be reality within twenty years.
– It means we could live forever in virtual worlds generated inside computer systems.
– It means we could live anywhere in the universe, wherever computer systems are able to work.
All of this can be realised within tens years IF SOCIETY DEMANDS IT. (läs mer)
Vision:If you want to accelerate the creation of this technology, give your “YES” for Mind Uploading Technology here:Produkter:http://www.minduploadingproject.org/blog/2010/01/yes-for-mind-uploading-technology.html

1. Nils E.UNov 10th 2010

This is all part of the Totalitarian tiptoe to microchip people. When this happens more and more often in ever greater areas of our lives, there comes a point where each person reaches the stage of unquestioning, unthinking, acquiesnence. Unthinking acquienscence where the comforty = comfort! You’re so comfortable and passive you go with the flow. The idea is to include all sources of surveillance and control… medical records etc. including every aspect of that persons life and views to be linked to a central computer so that person can be revealed on a single screen.

1. Police Maggan SWENov 10th 2010

This is a terrifying prospect. People around the globe are waking up to the plan for global domination by the unimaginably rich elites. As more people realize what’s going the faster these gigantic corporations are going to spit out police state technology to keep their “slaves” in check. Sad world we are living in today, sad scary world.

1. Tillman USANov 10th 2010

yes, really frightening stuff. I can’t believe no trails at least since they say it’s the same drug. A radio transmitter really makes it a LOT different. I don’t want a Radio transmitter in my body. It seems that we are to be watched, tracked and made sure that we do what someone else says we must. There was a hearing this Spring in the Senate on Aging discussing just how great this all would be!! They are trying to have broadband over the electric wires, pills that track, a medical ‘force’ that makes sure you take your medications etc. This is just one of the first times I saw it mainstream. We really do have to stop this!

1. Fred T E.UNov 11th 2010

Sounds incredible! Could prove that ‘consiousness’ (and all the spiritual beliefs we associate with this subjective experience) is just a product of our highly evolved brains. I can’t begin to imagine the influence it might have on neuroscience as well as psychological disorders. What fascinating potential….

1. Magnus Contact:Nov 12th 2010

The basic conclusion is that an A.B. can impose a threat for mankind if not done correctly, with knowledge and implemented control-systems. The required knowledge reaches a little wider than just simple psychology, neurology or electronics !

1. Prof. Dr. Indrajit RaiDec 18th 2010

… Being a professor of War Studies, I found, during my military research, the mind-control technique applied to the war prisoners. It is an electromagnetic mind-control technique which can take full control of the person’s body and mind permanently. It uses modulated microwave to produce audible voices in the person’s head. It is in the form of subliminal hypnotic command and the victim can be hypnotically programmed for years without knowing.

Thoughts are implanted in the victim’s mind without letting him know. In microwave hearing, nobody can hear the voices except the targeted individual. The sound reverberates in the target’s ear monotonously. In a solitary cell the high pitched sound gets amplified. Slowly it stirs the unconscious layer of the mind and deeply affects the nerves. …

1. Michael ADec 20th 2010

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

When replacing a part of my brain with an implant will I become a different person? Or rather a robot? Will I be aware that I have a partial artificial brain, or I turn into a zombie? What happens to my free will – can I control my prosthesis or denture, which will govern me?

1. Magnus Contact:Dec 21st 2010

“This Blur the Line Between Medical Decisions and police actions. If You are going to allow doctors to take people’s liberty away, Do They Have to Be independent. That credibility is undermined When The Doctors ARE part of the Sami team as the police. This raises Serious Concerns. First, That You Have A Unit That allows Police Investigation to Lead Directly to PeopleSoft-being sectioned Without Any kind of criminal proceedings. Secondly, it is-being done under the umbrella of anti-terrorism at a time-when the government is looking for ways to detain terrorists Without Them putting on trial. “

Scotland Yard refused hock to Discuss How Many Suspects Have Been forcibly hospitalized by the team, because “of” Patient Confidentiality. “Meanwhile, Conservative members of the British government to Have Ftac hailed as the first joint mental health – Police Unit in the United Kingdom and a “prototype for future joint services” In Other Areas. They Are Introducing legislation to broads The definition of mental disorders to give doctors – and now police – more power to detain people.

24/12/2010